Which type of requirements should avoid specificity unless absolutely necessary?

Service type requirements should avoid excessive specificity unless absolutely necessary because they often need to remain flexible to adapt to changing needs and circumstances. In the context of operational contract support, service requirements are typically focused on the outcome and the broad objectives that need to be achieved rather than stipulating narrow, detailed methods of how the service should be conducted. This flexibility allows contractors to apply their expertise and innovation in delivering services, which can lead to improved efficiency and effectiveness in meeting operational goals. Over-specifying these requirements may stifle creativity and limit the contractor's ability to respond to unforeseen challenges or adapt to unique situations that arise during service delivery.

Other requirement types, such as performance-based or personnel management requirements, might benefit from clarity and specificity to ensure accountability and aligned expectations. Performance-based requirements, for example, focus on the desired outcomes and results, providing a clear framework for performance measurement. In contrast, while contractor background check requirements indeed need clarity, they often hinge on regulatory and safety standards that necessitate precise requirements to ensure compliance and security.