Which factor is NOT typically considered in "best value" evaluations?

In the context of "best value" evaluations, factors such as quality, past performance, and technical capabilities are essential criteria typically considered to assess the overall suitability and effectiveness of a proposal. "Best value" evaluations aim to identify the proposal that offers the most advantageous combination of price and non-price factors, ensuring that the selected contractor can deliver the best outcome for the government or organization.

Quality is vital because it directly influences the effectiveness and reliability of the product or service. Past performance provides insight into a contractor's history of success and reliability, helping evaluators gauge the likelihood of future performance. Technical capabilities are also crucial, as they demonstrate the contractor's ability to meet the technical requirements of the project.

In contrast, company size is not generally a determining factor in these evaluations. While a large company may have resources and capabilities, it does not inherently guarantee better quality, performance, or technical expertise. Therefore, company size is not typically factored into "best value" evaluations, making it the correct answer for the question posed.