What guidance should be followed for developing requirements within operational contract support?

The correct approach for developing requirements within operational contract support is to adhere to local command policies and operational needs. This is crucial because the effectiveness and efficiency of operational contract support are heavily dependent on aligning with the specific objectives and priorities set by local military commands. Each operational environment has unique circumstances, and tailoring the requirements to fit those local needs ensures that the contracts will effectively support the mission, enhancing readiness and operational capabilities.

Local command policies provide a framework within which operations are conducted, and understanding actual operational needs allows for a more targeted approach when drafting requirements. This alignment ensures that the resources contracted will adequately address the challenges faced in the specific operational context, facilitating mission success.

While guidance such as legislative mandates and military orders might shape broader strategic frameworks, they do not necessarily address the nuanced needs of specific missions. Market conditions and pricing strategies, while important for cost-effectiveness, should not dictate the fundamental requirements, as they may not align with the actual needs of the operation. Similarly, feedback from previous contractor evaluations can inform future contracting actions but does not replace the need for an in-depth understanding of current local operational requirements when developing new contractual needs.